Monday, 5 January 2009
Saturday, 29 November 2008
Mumbai
Mumbai: attack on all fronts
- Hamish McDonald
- November 29, 2008
Exit: foreign tourists leave Mumbai after the attacks. Photo: AFP
THERE was a one-day cricket match on television, and the streets were almost empty in the old part of Mumbai, down on the peninsula that juts into the Arabian Sea, where shops, restaurants and small hotels are crammed into once-gracious stone apartment blocks built for the former British commercial class and their local partners.
About 9.15pm, Bharat Tamore stepped out from his small apartment to walk to the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel, where his night shift as a junior manager was due to start at 10pm. Diverting to the waterfront to enjoy the sea breeze, he noticed something unusual.
"It was a small inflatable raft, not usually seen in our parts, where fishermen ply only small boats," Tamore told The Times of India. "In the darkness, I saw eight young men stepping out of the raft, two at a time. They jumped into the waters, and picked up a haversack. They bent down again, and came up carrying two more haversacks, one in each hand."
Tamore approached the young men, who looked in their 20s and were wearing jeans and jackets, and asked them what they were doing. "We're students," one said. Tamore accepted the explanation. Six of the young men went off, carrying the haversacks, which seemed to be very heavy. Two got back in the dinghy, started the outboard, and shot off into the darkness.
The hotel worker walked to the back entrance of the Taj, the luxury century-old stone pile facing the harbour near the triumphal Gateway of India built for King George V's tour of the jewel in his empire, and started changing into his uniform. Soon after, he heard gunshots coming from the fashionable Shamiana restaurant, where Mumbai's business and financial wizards mix with wealthy tourists and Bollywood film figures for late suppers. It began a night of terror that ended when Tamore was guided from his hiding place by police at 4am.
For the attackers, Wednesday night was the culmination of careful preparation that must have begun weeks and months earlier, possibly in neighbouring Pakistan. It now appears that some time in the
12 days before the attack, up to 20 young fanatics had overwhelmed the crew of a 14-metre trawler called the Kuber after it sailed from the Gujarat port of Porbander for a 10-day fishing trip.
Capable of only seven or eight nautical miles an hour, the trawler plodded down the coast towards Mumbai, mingling with the hundreds of local fishing and trading boats plying the generally calm seas. Several kilometres off the brightly lit "Maximum City", as Mumbai was dubbed by writer Suketu Mehta, the little vessel stopped, and two inflatables were launched. The attackers sped into the metropolis of 15 million people, leaving a dead captain on the bobbing trawler and no sign of the four other crew. Carrying their rucksacks of metal ammunition clips and grenades, and their concealed Kalashnikov automatic rifles, the young men were dropped at jetties around the peninsula, close to their targets.
A bit after 9.30, two gunmen went to the Leopold Cafe, once a haunt of minor underworld figures, Somali traders and wizened Western hippies made famous in Australian jail escapee Gregory David Roberts' novel Shantaram, and now a self-consciously "low-life" locale for backpackers, locally based professionals and aircrews — even selling its own T-shirt.
From the pavements outside, where vendors were starting to close their stalls and lay down mats to sleep, they opened up with their automatic rifles through the open sides, before tossing in grenades. Two young Australians were among the many injured, lying with about eight dead customers and waiters.
The two then fled down a side street that leads directly to the Taj Hotel, and joined others to enter via a side door normally kept locked but open that night because of weddings and corporate functions. They walked into the lobby, a wide expanse of marble and fountains, and opened fire. Some headed into the Shamiana, spraying gunfire, and trying to single out American and British citizens as captives. Then they headed up to the residential suite of the hotel general manager, Karambir Kang, showing a familiarity with the detailed layout and passageways of the old building. Kang's wife and two children are reported to have been killed during the siege and fire that then started.
Among the dead left by the mayhem was Greek millionaire Andreas Liveras, owner of a luxury yacht charter business who had come to scout for opportunities. French nuclear scientist Georges Vendryes, known as the father of the fast-breeder reactor, managed to escape along with his wife, as did Australian cricket lawyer Dean Kino, who had come to help prepare the Champions League twenty20 competition, now postponed.
Another group stormed the lobby of the Oberoi Trident, another luxury hotel on the other side of the peninsula, where guests included a 25-member NSW trade delegation. Attackers sprayed the lobby with gunfire and tossed grenades as staff and guests fled through the kitchens, before holing up on the 19th floor with foreign and local hostages.
Midway up the peninsula, four gunmen walked into the concourse of the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, the vast neo-Saracenic railway station once named after Queen Victoria. Pulling out their guns, they opened fire at random among commuters getting late trains home, killed about 10 people and left the polished floors awash with gore. The attackers ran off towards the nearby Cama Hospital.
Hemant Karkare, head of Maharashtra state's Anti-Terrorism Squad, had been summoned from his official flat. A veteran of the elite national police service, he'd taken up the key Mumbai-based position after seven years in Vienna working under diplomatic cover for the Indian external intelligence service, the Research and Analysis Wing or RAW. Already he'd shown a fearless disregard for political pressure, arresting a Hindu holyman and a serving army lieutenant-colonel for a recent bombing in the inland city of Malegaon that had been portrayed initially as an Islamist plot.
Arriving at the railway station, Karkare put on a bullet-proof vest and helmet, and set off in pursuit of the attackers. Some time before he got to the Cama Hospital, however, Karkare removed the protective gear, and in a close-quarter clash, died with three bullets in the chest, while two other senior police died alongside him.
The night of slaughter went on, with attackers killing two security guards at the hospital, some seizing a police vehicle and driving through the city shooting at random, and others trying to keep police bailed up inside their headquarters and shooting up the popular Regal cinema. A separate attack caught a rabbi, his family and several Jewish worshippers at the small Chabad Lubovitch centre, back down the peninsula. As Thursday opened, police were reinforced with truckloads of army and navy commandos from nearby barracks, and elite special forces from the National Security Guard.
As operations proceeded to isolate and overwhelm gunmen and save hotel guests, police and intelligence officials began interrogating three of the attackers captured alive. Indian press reports quoted Major-General R. K. Hooda, the leader of the operations, as saying the attackers had pretended to come from Hyderabad, an ancient city with a big Muslim population in central India, but they had captured one man who spoke with a Punjabi accent and appeared to be from Pakistan. Some reports named the man as Ajmal Amir Kamal, a resident of Multan in Pakistan.
Even before this information, the precision and planning of the concerted attacks pointed to an expertise beyond the scope of India's domestic extremists. As the London-based Jane's group reported in its Country Risk Daily Report: "From a tactical perspective most terrorist attacks in India have been carried out through the use of improvised explosive devices planted on bicycles, motorcycles and cars, and triggered by timers or mobile telephones."
To Yogesh Pratap Singh, a former senior policeman and now a Mumbai barrister, the use of the sea approach to enable a large number of men and weapons to avoid the normal surveillance screening pointed to a link with Pakistan-based organisations.
"It seems to be a highly trained operation," he said. "They kept it very secret, they don't allow any information to come out, and they're ready to die: such a wide, comprehensive and immaculate modus operandi is that of al-Qaeda."
The Jane's assessment also emphasised the apparent focus on killing or capturing foreign business people, specifically US and British nationals, had not occurred previously and suggested "a wider global anti-Western agenda" in contrast to national issues that appeared to motivate recent Indian incidents.
A leading Indian intelligence and terrorism expert, former senior RAW official B. Raman, said sheer expense pointed to assistance from Pakistan, either its intelligence service, exiled Mumbai mafia figures such as gang boss Dawood Ibrahim, or al-Qaeda and its Pakistani affiliates. "Indian boys who had taken to terrorism in the name of Indian Mujahideen, they do not have that kind of money at their disposal," Raman said. "I personally feel this has the clear stamp of al-Qaeda."
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh also pointed the finger after an emergency cabinet meeting on Thursday. "The well-planned and well-orchestrated attacks, probably with external linkages, were intended to create a sense of panic, by choosing high-profile targets and indiscriminately killing foreigners," Singh said in a national TV address. "It is evident that the group which carried out these attacks, based outside the country, had come with single-minded determination to create havoc in the commercial capital of the country … We will take up strongly with our neighbours that the use of their territory for launching attacks on us will not be tolerated, and that there would be a cost if suitable measures are not taken by them."
This would point to terrorist groups based in Pakistan, such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba, which transferred their attention and deadly expertise from the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan to undermining Indian rule in its part of Kashmir during the 1990s, with active assistance from Pakistan's Interservices Intelligence at least until September 11, 2001. These groups have a record of suicide attacks, both in Kashmir and more widely in India, including the December 2001 assault on the Indian parliament.
Yet the only early claimant to responsibility was a hitherto unknown group calling itself the "Deccan Mujahideen", which emailed claims to Indian media via a Russian server. Deccan, the plateau of central India in which Hyderabad is located, seemed to link to the attackers' cover story, and Mujahideen to a new terrorist group, the Indian Mujahideen, that had emerged after serial blasts in three northern Indian cities in November 2007, and later claimed to have carried out the July 2006 train bombings in Mumbai itself, as well as bombings this year in Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and New Delhi.
But the Indian Mujahideen is in many ways even more of a danger for India than groups such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba.
It appears to draw on alienated elements among India's own vast population of Muslims, numbering 140 million. Its recruits include some young people whose family members suffered in the vicious anti-Muslim progroms that swept Mumbai and other centres at the end of 1992, after the destruction of the disputed Ayodhya mosque by Hindu zealots, and in Gujarat in 2002. A wider pool is the Students' Islamic Movement of India, a banned organisation of religious purists.
They include many well-educated and well-travelled people, able to find their way around the higher echelons of the global economy and India itself.
Among suspected members arrested in Mumbai not long before this attack were three IT professionals, including one with a senior position in yahoo.com who had visited the US. This would suggest that as well as a sharpened counterterrorist intelligence performance, India has a huge task of rebuilding faith in its secular politics. This faith has been eroded by the desultory efforts to sheet home blame for the 1992 Mumbai progrom against complicit police and politicians, and by the impunity of Gujarat's chief minister, Narendra Modi, and his police for their role in whipping up that state's horrific violence in 2002.
As national elections approach in the first half of next year, Singh's Congress Party Government is struggling to find balance between a Hindu-nationalist opposition, the Bharatiya Janata Party, baying for a crackdown on terrorism and its duty to protect Muslims from oppressive surveillance. Violence between Hindu extremists and Christian converts in eastern states, the growing Maoist insurgency in central regions, and the delicate Kashmir situation add to the precarious security mix.
Yet so far the Indian Mujahideen may just be local cover for outside groups. In limited contact by Indian media with a few of the attackers, they seem motivated by concerns dealing with Kashmir and India's strategic position. "Are you aware how many people have been killed in Kashmir?" asked one attacker naming himself as Imran, who called a TV station from the Jewish centre siege. "Are you aware how your army has killed Muslims?"
In May, the Lashkar-e-Taiba head, Abdul Subhan Qureshi, threatened to attack tourist sites unless the Government withdrew its support for the US, and has claimed responsibility for the recent bombings in Bangalore, Ahmedebad and Delhi. This suggests the aim of putting a high price for India — by striking at its investment and tourism inflows — on its backing for the Karzai Government in Kabul, and its detente with Pakistan over Kashmir, which though fragile allows the Pakistan Army to divert forces to fighting the Taliban along the Northwest Frontier.
If one result is also a boost to the Hindu nationalists in India's politics and harsher monitoring of India's Muslims, that is not just collateral damage but another wedge into the secular structures that have kept India together for more than 60 years.
Hamish McDonald is a senior Fairfax writer, specialising in the Asia-Pacific region.
Friday, 28 November 2008
Mumbai
Elsewhere in the hotel, guests fleeing to the rear of the building away from the lobby ran straight into the path of another gunman. Sajjid Karim, a British MEP, said: “He was at the rear gate, holding a large machine gun .He pointed it at the crowd and started to use it.".
About five minutes' drive north from the Taj, at about 10.30pm, four men armed with automatic weapons walked into a restaurant at CST, India's main railway station. They opened fire indiscriminately on the families dining there, changing their magazines three times. “It was a massacre,” one eyewitness said.
At 11.15pm, an American couple, Deb and Gary Hvass were making their way back to their hotel near the Taj. They passed Leopolds, a café popular with western backpackers, which had been attacked about an hour earlier. The shopfront, usually open to the bustle of Apollo Bunder, one of Bombay's most popular tourist streets, was shuttered.
Inside, drinks and meals were left half-consumed. Six bullet holes had pierced a window of a four-wheel drive jeep parked next to the café. Bloodstains streaked the floor. As the couple walked by, a local hissed at them: “Get off the streets. They're looking for your kind."
By 3am, back in the Taj, about 300 people had been holed up in Chambers, the business centre that had been commandeered as a makeshift bunker by guests and staff, for several hours. "It was surprisingly calm," Parizaad Khan said. "The staff were handing out blankets and water." Shortly after 3am, part of the group was told - or decided themselves, Ms Khan is not sure - to make a break for it through a maze of service corridors. They split themselves into parties of about ten people. "I was in the fourth group," Parizaad said. We were waiting to run down these very narrow corridors, but suddenly there were shots very, very close. The group split. Some went on, others turned back. I went back and spent hours face down on the floor, too terrified to move."
By this stage, the police were desperately trying to out how many terrorist had struck and where. Their best guess was at least 26 gunmen at as many as 16 locations. The head of Bombay's anti-terror squad had been shot and killed. Soldiers had assembled around the stricken hotels, apparently preparing to storm the buildings. Across Bombay, chaos reigned: close to the domestic airport, a taxi had blown up. Closer to the Taj, a boat laden with explosives had been discovered and it was thought seven gunmen had taken over a Jewish family's home in a block of flats. More soldiers were gathering outside that building. It was thought that perhaps five terrorists had been killed and at least 80 members of the public had died.
Intelligence sources began muttering about a foreign hand, a thinly veiled nod towards Pakistan.
By 5am, at Bombay's St George Hospital, Peter Keep, a British entrepreneur had counted at least 40 dead bodies. “It's not an experience that will leave me soon," he said.
On India's television networks it was being reported that a previously unknown group called the Deccan Mujahideen had taken responsibility for the attacks. Later, it was claimed that the group had demanded in return for the hostages the release of members of the Indian Mujahideen, a group that has launched a string of devastating bomb attacks across India in recent months.
Meanwhile, the upper floors of the Taj, where it was feared scores of hostages had been taken, had been set ablaze. “The terrorists want to kill everybody,” a senior fireman said. “We have no idea how many people are dead inside.”
At about 8am on Thursday, Parizaad Khan finally escaped from the Taj. She was herded onto a bus at the lobby door by heavily armed commandos. As it sped away, terrorists opened fire on the fleeing bus. Half an hour later, shorts were heard at the Jewish family's home.
By 9am, there appeared to be a lull. Around this time it is thought that Indian security forces began to creep through both the Taj and the Oberoi, searching for terrorists room-to-room.
Outside the Taj, drivers were still waiting for the clients they had dropped off more than 12 hours earlier. Many companies had established contact with executives trapped in the building: Standard & Poors, the ratings agency, was calling two hostages every 45 minutes.
The following hours saw a tense stand-off between the terrorists and the waiting security forces. An official later claimed the hostage situation at the Taj was over. The call was premature: at about 3pm two more explosions were heard at the hotel. The Indian government later said that 200 hostages were being held at the Oberoi.
By 3.30pm on Thursday, the first death rites of those killed the night before had begun.
Posts
